Niantic BLAMES Pokevision + Fallout 4 Mods on PS4 STILL Delayed + Imgur Hacker Gets 5K

Comments

9 years ago

I really like your eye jewelry looks awesome.

9 years ago

I like that they're not splitting the Avengers movie into two movies. Ever since Harry Potter did it, everyone does it even if the movie doesn't have enough content to justify it. Hopefully the "part 1" will be a complete story rather then the first half of one.

HeyItsHayden

9 years ago

Dammit Bethesda! Just let me have my Macho Man Deathclaws!

Miglupis

9 years ago

I am not too worried about the infinity war thing. Knowing marvel, it could be the same as pt 1/2 but with a cooler name. Or it could be the aftermath, rebuilding, reintroducing characters, bowing others out...It's marvel. Do they ever miss, really? Their worst movies are good. and better by far than some other super hero movies...

SecretlyASpider

9 years ago

I posted this on this week's AHWU as well, I'd just really like some answers.

Every entertainment news site is reporting on the title change for the next Avengers film. I did some research, and every article does one of two things: links to a different article as its source for the information, or states that the Russo brothers implied in May that the next two Avengers films would be retitled. There's no press release, no interview, no statement from Marvel, Disney or the Russo brothers that I have found. A couple of articles did show a title card for 'Avengers: Infinity War' (without a Part I), but it turns out that was a fan made poster that can be found on deviant art. Has anyone found any real information about this? Or is this just a giant media circlejerk? (No offence to the AH guys, they're reporting the news as it appears). I'd really like some solid info on this.

Update from this The Know: the Variety article says Disney confirmed the renaming to 'Avengers: Infinity War' and 'Untitled Avengers', but again doesn't cite any sources for this. I just really want to find the original source that made this announcement.

raulkolk

9 years ago

Couldn't Variety have gained the information directly from Disney?

SecretlyASpider

9 years ago

@raulkolk I suppose it's possible. I'm not sure why Disney would spill information (especially information that's relatively irrelevant; it's hardly a big move to change the names) to a single source, and not as a press release. And following that, I don't know why Variety wouldn't explain that they had inside information, because that is a gold mine in media - having the scoop on something, being on the forefront of a story is so important - you'd think the article would mention they had specialist knowledge no-one else had.

Again, I get that it's a relatively small revelation, but given that, why is it apparently such big news, and why does it seem like no-one has actually checked if it's true?

OniZonda

9 years ago

"no-butt-y" look at Ashley bringing the puns

nicus9

9 years ago

Hey I suffer from the serious condition noassitol, its not a joke :P

Charblasaur

9 years ago

If i find someone looking at my butt i pucker it up nice and tight

Join the conversation! Log in to post a comment.