This feels like such a circlejerk of wanting to shit on something just to shit on it. 'Stadia still has no point". Really? What? Portability, it's pretty obvious. Like, the whole episode, they're talking about "I'd just sit at my computer and use my games on a hard drive, why would I want to do it any other way?" while at NO POINT bringing up the Nintendo Switch, an absolute FIRE SALE of a console in the current generation, and had it released alongside the PS4 and Xbox One would EASILY be the crowning console of the generation. Why? PORTABILITY, as well as a robust game library of course since it's Nintendo. Stadia is trying to push forward the capabilities to play games that are normally too intensive to be portable. With how prominent Nintendo Switch has become in the gaming space, there are still videos dicking on graphics on Switch simply because it doesn't have the hardware to run it well. However, here's Stadia providing you the graphic fidelity we WANT to see, and the barrier is latency. With that said, it's only a matter of time before latency becomes a minimal, even non existent issue just as any other previous gaming limitations were in the past. Rest in peace, OnLive, because they were pushing this idea forward WAY before the capabilities were there, but Stadia is in a different generation, with a more accepting industry of the concept, and has a chance to maybe not become the standard of the industry, but something that will push companies into embracing and putting resources behind the idea. Like, the only real negative here is latency, and that's only a matter of time before it gets worked out, especially if more companies begin looking into how to remedy it