@BenPup Not surprised but then apparently Dice don't care about historical accuracy... but then that was a given given Battlefield 1. Having said that their competition, CoD, is so accurate they couldn't hit the broad side of a barn with a shotgun at point blank range... so... *shrug* I get my warfare elsewhere entirely.
i gotta say that i would pay for BF premium pass! i have since Bad Company 2, (it sound cool that its free) but dice in the BF franchise has done a great job in developing extra maps and i think that they are entitled to ask for a fee to play them! i can only imagine how hard it must be to be a map creator. and i personally think that its fine for BF to charge for premium. I mean come on, 20 HUGE! maps for bf1 premium, while base game gave what, 10? and every game is different! give credit where credit is due! and pay the people for the hard work they've done.
@Brawlgo That's all well and good but as has been said many times premium passes split the player base and that kills off your revenue stream in the long run so microtransactions are a better way to pay those map creators... sorry but that's just the way it is.
Well CoD WWII hit less than half of the war, and even that was half-assed. Battlefield 1 was, is, and will continue to be an amazing game. As long as Dice doesn't mess up in a huge way, Battlefield 5 should be an amazing game as well.
@NickCheeseburger ok calm down nick. i'm a huge BF fan and i support it every chance i can, but sadly most time i try to find a match, i find myself in a server with 1/64 people in it. i want BF to be back on top though.
Haven't played Battlefield since 4 and I'm definitely jumping back in on this one but I do have to ask the question.....has forced multiplayer co-op ever worked out before?
I'm interested to know more about it. Seems like maybe it's an alternate history or a secret weapons of WWII kind of game. Or that could just be the multiplayer? Either way, looks neat!