This year's conference was so anticlimactic that several news outlets weren't even sure it was over, and it was honestly at least half gimmicks and musical instruments. But these announcements come earlier and earlier every year so Sony's probably gonna do some Nintendo-style livestream a week early.
@GrisellJumpTJD LOL, you actually think that quality has had any impact upon Sony's decision? Also, something that Brian and Jenn seem to have purposefully ignored is the fact that Sony also canceled their own PlayStation specific convention as well.
I'd be happy for E3 to go away, there'd be less hype in a hype obsessed industry, a smoother release cycle of games (all we'd need to do after that is get rid of Xmas! :P and the pointless spending of millions on something that doesn't really do anything more than shmooze journalists, stroke the egos of CEOs and cause chaos and broken promises in the games market - Nintendo do perfectly well getting their news out with Nintendo Directs... and it costs them a huge amount less to do them too! :)
@RiverRunning It seems you've fallen for the false narrative that E3 is only about announcements and nothing else as well as the ridiculous idea that Nintendo doesn't have a presence there still. E3 has NEVER been about the announcements unless you are in the gaming news media. It has always been about interacting directly with developers, enthusiasts, and regular consumers (the last has expanded mostly in recent years).
@Kalilaila And you seem to be under the impression that the term "interacting" is not not replaceable with the term "shmoozing" (oops I typo'd the original ;) and seeing it from the public side of view doesn't change what's happening... it's also worth bearing in mind history - history says in big thirty foot high neon lettering that as soon as a conference starts giving more access to the public it is because it is having trouble convincing the industry it still has a purpose... it's no surprise that the opening up to the public happened as it started dying - so, like I said, it is about feeding the hype train which is clearly a problem when your titles can't catch up to the hype - however good they are, god forbid they be bad because in that case you'll get your studio shutdown; so devs at E3 become subservient to the whims of marketing - often not part of their own studio in the case of the big publishers and console makers so... well shit. And if you don't believe the hype train isn't a problem with E3 then how come people are so commonly keeping track of the broken promises that E3 produces every year and why some of the material shown would also be in direct breach of the law (both Trading Standards and Advertising) in the UK were the con held here (it's true they don't sound like much but both agencies are kinds like Bulldogs rather than Rottweilers; they've a nasty bite that they just won't let go of and if you don't know that then that's your fault for breaking the law).
I don’t mind not seeing Sony every year, if every 2-3 years they would reveal an amazing quality game compared to rushing out half assed dlcs and expansions every year
@CiarasStuff You seem to be under the mistaken idea that them not showing is going to at all affect how they choose to make money. If anything, them not appearing at E3 will result in them accelerating the rate at which they do those things. Events like E3 allow for the interaction between the developers and the consumers (both regular and enthusiasts). Not attending E3, as well as not having their own PlayStation convention, means that they get to avoid that interaction as well as any negative feedback about their products (new and old).
It is sad that every single gaming media group and personality continues to act as the purpose of E3 is solely to announce video games; those announcements are just a minor part. The gaming media further acts like the only thing that Sony is going to lose out on is showing videos and making their tacky, flashy presentation which wastes more time with music numbers than info about games. The reason why Nintendo and Microsoft, and most Developers of import still have a presence and attend E3 is because of the interaction that it offers with enthusiasts as well as consumers in general as well as the huge amount of free press from major new outlets as opposed to niche gaming ones. Sony will noticeably suffer (and this kind of thing is easily seen) from not attending next year both due to their name not being mentioned in association with it, but also due because no one will be there playing or trying any of their game new or old. The videos and presentations are minor in comparison. The interactions that happen both between the developers, enthusiasts, & consumers and between the enthusiasts/consumers and the products has more impact in the long term than any of the videos or presentations. Sony has never taken criticism well; this is how they deal with it.
I mean they cancelled their own PlayStation convention. If you actually think that was done just because they didn't have anything to show, then you're delusional.
Jenn: "This was corporate buzzword Madlibs" Haha. Nailed it! That cracked me up. So, i know it isn't quite the same, but it does remind me of Apple pulling out of the yearly Macworld Expos they used to have. Their reasoning was their Apple Stores were the way to reach audiences. Not sure that Sony has quite that same network of retail presence (I mean one they fully control and I'd argue the few limited Sony Boutique stores don't quite focus on Sony's gaming side). I agree it is an interesting move and will be curious what announcements/news they will release around the E3 timeframe if any.