Ubisoft Can't Decide Whether The Division 2 is Political or Not

I personally don't think the game will be too political and it's not going to make any sort of judgment against the people in power due to the fact that the attack didn't happen on DC it started in New York City in the first game and has now spread to the rest of not only America but as they said spread to the world

I personally don't think the game will be too political and it's not going to make any sort of judgment against the people in power due to the fact that the attack didn't happen on DC it started in New York City in the first game and has now spread to the rest of not only America but as they said spread to the world

ofc you can have a game in DC without it getting political look at Fallout 3 you fools

I mean, it is slightly political, but the message isn't about being for or against a particular set of ideals. The corruption from within bit is pretty much any one who has power is abusing it for their own gains and you're standing up for the rights of everyone, especially those who can't defend for themselves. Other than that, I don't see it as being left or right winged in any capacity. Maybe it's just because I'm just too much in the middle and agree with both sides on a lot of subjects.

funny how one buzz-word automatically gets associated with negativity in every capacity. Something can be thought-provoking without insisting on one "side" of an issue.

Hmm, now I want a Division game set in London and Japan. I love the game and story of Division, and would enjoy seeing it take place in other settings as well as America. Give it the ol' Assassin's Creed treatment

"We're here to explore a new city" that is also being explored by TWO OTHER POST-APOCALYPTIC SHOOTERS THIS YEAR ALONE. Come on, my dudes. There are so many other cities to explore in games. Even Chicago hasn't been featured since Watch Dogs and The Crew.